Department: Doctor of Education
Module Description: The principles, concepts and theories of human learning psychology are presented in detail with emphasis on cognitive approaches, their interpretation of how learning occurs and what is required to orient teaching to respond to the nature of learning. The personality of the human being, the issues of personal learning characteristics, the situation of human motivation for learning are examined from a research perspective and from the viewpoint of classroom applications. Specific aspects of learning language, mathematics, science, leadership and special education are explored. The main concepts, principles, methods and controversies concerning the measurement of student leaning are also examined including how the statistical tools and procedures are applied in testing and assessment in different subject disciplines.
Long, M. (2011). The psychology of education. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Ormrod, J. E. and Jones, B. D. (2023). Essentials of educational psychology: big ideas to guide effective teaching. 6th edn. NY, NY: Pearson. Purchase eBook
Slavin, R. (2018). Educational psychology: theory and practice. 12th edn. Boston: Pearson.
Other texts:
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Pressley, M. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Sternberg, R (2017). Cognitive psychology. 7th edn. New York, NY: Cengage learning.
Management and Leadership
Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, K. (1998). Management theories for educational change. London: Paul Chapman.
Science Education
Special Inclusive Education
Gaad, E. & Thabet, R. (2009). Needs assessment for effective inclusion in United Arab Emirates’ government schools. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, vol. 4(6), pp. 159-171. Request this item
Al Rosan, F. (1999). Assessment & diagnosis of special education (in Arabic). Dar E L. Fekr. Aman.
TESOL
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language assessment. 3rd edn. Pearson.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coombe, C., Davidson, P. & Wayne, J. (2005). Assessment in the Arab world. Dubai, UAE: TESOL Arabia.
Davies, A. (1990). Principles of language testing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. London: Pearson Longman.
Kopriva, R. (2008). Improving testing for English language learners. Routledge.
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Madsen, H.S. (1983). Techniques in testing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ICT
Abrams, S. S., Chen, X. and Downton, M. P. (2018). Managing educational technology: school partnerships & technology integration. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Bates, A.W.T. and Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education. strategies for transforming teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Kaplanis, D. (2013). 5 reasons why blended learning works. Retrieved from http://blog.talentlms.com/5-reasons-why-blended-learning-works/
Quillen, I. (2013). The rise of blended learning. Smithsonian.com. Retrieved from http://www.smithsonianmag.com/ideas-innovations/The-Rise-of-Blended-Learning214602391.html
Karamizadeh et.al. (2012). The study of effectiveness of blended learning approach for medical training courses. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, vol.14(1), pp. 41-44. Request item
Pachler, N., Bachmair, B. and Cook, J. (2010). Mobile Learning. Springer.
Wu, J-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010) A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers and Education, 55, 155-164. Request item